Cases 1 - 10 of 2,706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Rafiyq Davis v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 24-2028
Plaintiff:
RAFIYQ DAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
PINCK v. SOMERSET PROBATION
as 3:2024cv06686
Plaintiff:
DAVID HENRY PINCK
Defendant:
SOMERSET PROBATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
PARKER v. SHAPIRO et al
as 2:2024cv02279
Plaintiff:
GORDON ROY PARKER
Defendant:
JOSHUA DAVID SHAPIRO, MICHELLE HENRY, DEBORAH L. BOGEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
WALKER v. BUCKS COUNTY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv02376
Plaintiff:
CLINTON WALKER
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DEPUTY WARDEN DAVID GALIONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
BRETZIK v. KOVALCHIK et al
as 5:2024cv01452
Plaintiff:
GERALD ROBERT BRETZIK
Defendant:
JOSEPH KOVALCHIK, JAMES CHUSS, MICHAEL BAIRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenneth Talley, et al v. Judith Horn, et al
as 24-1917
Plaintiff:
KENNETH R. TALLEY, JANICE A. TALLEY and KRISTINA KAREN TALLEY
Defendant:
JUDITH C. HORN, DARREN W. HORN, SR., DARREN W. HORN, JR. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
