Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Marianne Sawicki v. Michael Kipphan, et al
as 24-2120
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE SAWICKI
Defendant:
MICHAEL M. KIPPHAN, LORI HEATON, RICHARD A. WILSON and others
Marianne Sawicki v. Michael Kipphan, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE SAWICKI
Defendant:
MICHAEL M. KIPPHAN, LORI HEATON, RICHARD A. WILSON and others
MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP v. SMITH et al
as 2:2023cv03613
Plaintiff:
MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP
Defendant:
CURTIS G. SMITH and C.G.S.J. Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Smith, Jr. v. Zanic et al
as 1:2022cv00609
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
George N. Zanic and David G. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sawicki v. Kipphan et al
as 1:2021cv02031
Plaintiff:
Marianne Sawicki
Defendant:
Michael M. Kipphan, Lori Heaton, Richard A. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conway et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2020cv01486
Defendant:
James L. Brennan, Jr., Tiffany S. Kominski, F. J. Monaghan and others
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Conway, Michael C. Morris and Stephen G. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTINEZ v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC. et al
as 5:2020cv01891
Defendant:
HON EDWARD G. SMITH, HON. ROSLYNN MAUSKOFF, HON. JEFFREY SCHEMEHL and others
Plaintiff:
GILBERT M. MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTINEZ v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2019cv03708
Defendant:
HON. CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY, HON. MICHEAL A. CHAGARES, HON. JAMES KNOLL GARDNER and others
Plaintiff:
GILBERT M. MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CATERBONE v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 5:2018cv02710
Defendant:
MIKE GEESEY, ABIGAL PFLUMM, ASHLEY BLAKE and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEPHENS v. KENNEY et al
as 2:2018cv04295
Defendant:
PETER G. MYLONAS, BETTY G. STEPHENS, JENNIFER HALSTEN MADDALONI and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C. STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
