Cases 1 - 10 of 18
LYNCH v. Donnelly et al
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Mr. PETER J LYNCH
Defendant:
Atty Tanisha Bailey-Roka and Atty Kathryn Anne Donnelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GAGE v. BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE et al
as 2:2024cv05544
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I GAGE
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE, KEITH J. LYNCH and WILLIAM F. WALDRON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas Gage v. Keith Lynch, et al
as 23-1168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS I. GAGE
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH J. LYNCH, construction official and BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE
VANLOAN v. THE NATION OF ISLAM et al
as 2:2021cv02559
Defendant:
POLICE CHIEF DAVID NISLEIT, MAIN LINE HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., RICHARD ORLOW and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN VANLOAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAGE v. LYNCH et al
as 2:2020cv16236
Defendant:
KEITH J. LYNCH and BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I. GAGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00218
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
LYNCH v. THE CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2015cv03064
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. LYNCH
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILA., THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNA., THE PHILA. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUSTE v. UPMC MERCY HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2015cv00169
Plaintiff:
ANDRE JUSTE
Defendant:
UPMC MERCY HOSPITAL, MELISSA, TONY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LYNCH v. THE CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2014cv04414
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. LYNCH
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILA., THE PHILA TRAFFIC COURT and THE PHILA PARKING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Lynch, Sr. v. Vincent Fenerty, et al
as 12-2419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN J. LYNCH, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
VINCENT FENERTY, JAMES HOCH, KAREN SCANLAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
