Cases 1 - 10 of 11
LOGAN v. COLWYN BOROUGH et al
as 2:2023cv05160
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LOGAN
Defendant:
COLWYN BOROUGH, BOROUGH OF COLWYN, MAURICE J. CLARK, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Liptok v. CACL federal credit union et al
as 3:2021cv02144
Plaintiff:
John J. Liptok
Defendant:
CACL federal credit union, Robert A Mercuri, Edward J. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Dreibelbis v. Clark
as 4:2017cv01864
Plaintiff:
Wayne 'Skip" A. Dreibelbis
Defendant:
Benjamin J. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLD YORK LLC et al v. TOWNSHIP OF ABINGTON, et. al.
as 2:2016cv01731
Plaintiff:
OLD YORK LLC
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF ABINGTON and KENNETH J. CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maurice Clark, Sr., et al v. Borough of Colwyn, et al
as 15-3439
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MAURICE J. CLARK, SR.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
POLICE OFFICER KEVIN E. BANKS, SR., POLICE OFFICER BRYANT K. STERLING, POLICE OFFICER CLINTON CRADDOCK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BOROUGH OF COLWYN, WENDELL REED, Deputy Chief, Colwyn Borough Police Department, TREVOR PARHAM, Corporal, Colwyn Borough Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CLARK et al v. COLWYN BOROUGH et al
as 2:2012cv03668
Plaintiff:
MAURICE J. CLARK, SR. , KEVIN E. BANKS, SR. , BRYANT K. STERLING and others
Defendant:
COLWYN BOROUGH, WENDELL REED, SHERRI BEDFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLARK v. PROVIDENT BANK
as 2:2011cv04271
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. CLARK, JR.
Defendant:
PROVIDENT BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
