Cases 1 - 10 of 21
John Miller v. Thomas Nelling, et al
as 23-2788
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN RYAN MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS NELLING, THOMAS GOGGIN, JOHN O'DONNELL and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH ELIAS, TRACEY LAWS, MITCHELL ROCK and others
THOMPSON v. NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 3:2023cv20468
Plaintiff:
RANDY C. THOMPSON
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, MONMOUT COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE (MCPO) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER v. GOGGIN et al
as 2:2022cv03329
Plaintiff:
JOHN RYAN MILLER
Defendant:
THOMAS NELLING, JOSEPH ELIAS, TRACEY LAWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOLTER v. LOVETT et al
as 2:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW WOLTER
Defendant:
MICHAEL R. LOVETT and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv09105
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
WOLTER v. LOVETT et al
as 2:2020cv20341
Defendant:
TRACEY ANNE AGNEW, MICHAEL R LOVETT and JAMES MICHAEL DONNELLY
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A WOLTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovett v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2019cv01125
Defendant:
Loreen Cummings, Mari Finnon, Isaac Hebron and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Lovett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIEHL v. CITY OF JOHNSTOWN et al
as 3:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SIEHL
Defendant:
CITY OF JOHNSTOWN , CAMBRIA COUNTY, DAVID TULOWITZKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FINNEMEN v. RABNER et al
as 1:2018cv00656
Plaintiff:
NASIR FINNEMEN
Defendant:
STUART RABNER, ELENA EDWARDS, KIMBERLEY M. WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv08055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
