Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Dwight Campbell v. City of Logan Township, et al
as 22-1903
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWIGHT CAMPBELL
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF LOGAN, OFFICERS OF THE LOGAN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, NICOLE GRIPP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Stover v. Newberry Township et al
as 1:2021cv01445
Plaintiff:
Kurt D. Stover and Kurtis D. Stover
Defendant:
Newberry Township, Scott J. Gross, Steve Lutz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. CITY OF LOGAN TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2020cv00151
Defendant:
JUSTIN HOLLERN, TYLER MCCONNELL, NICOLE GRIPP and others
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUTZ v. NORTH FAYETTE TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2020cv00829
Defendant:
DONALD J. COKUS, JR., NORTH FAYETTE TOWNSHIP, DETECTIVE DONALD J. COKUS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. LUTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
WILSON v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2019cv19128
Defendant:
THOMAS LUTZ, JOHN DOE 1-10 and NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
