Cases 1 - 10 of 23
MILLER-BELL v. HALL et al
as 2:2023cv00924
Plaintiff:
CHERYL ANN MILLER-BELL
Defendant:
SARA HALL, REVEREND MICHAEL GESTRICH, SHAWNA WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DESHIREL N. BRYANT ALANDINA v. JONES et al
as 2:2023cv02017
Plaintiff:
DESHIREL N. BRYANT ALANDINA
Defendant:
JAMAIL GRAY JONES, MERYERS BLAZINORE, NATE SINGTRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01224
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
SHAKUR v. WALCOFF et al
as 1:2022cv04306
Plaintiff:
JIHAD TALIB-DIN ABDUL SHAKUR
Defendant:
MS. DANIELLE WALCOFF, MR. NATE CABERTO, MR. GARY BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DESHIREL NORMANDA BRYANT HAMILTON v. GRAY et al
as 2:2019cv05981
Defendant:
DAY CARE INSURE, ARUTH VASS, TOYLOR TEAYS HUMAN RESOURCES and others
Plaintiff:
DESHIREL NORMANDA BRYANT HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALVARADO v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv18574
Defendant:
Nate Pino, JOHN DOE 1-50, Curtis Catalano and others
Plaintiff:
RAMON ALVARADO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. GORDY et al
as 2:2019cv02916
Defendant:
RILEY KENNAN, REYNOLDS, NATE GORDY and others
Plaintiff:
NAZARIO BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WEAVER v. DOE et al
as 2:2018cv02059
Plaintiff:
KENDRA WEAVER
Defendant:
NATE DOE and PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramsey v. Nate et al
as 1:2018cv00643
Plaintiff:
Philip E. Ramsey
Defendant:
Nate and Bob
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Karash v. Erie County Municipality, et al
as 16-3295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK WILLIAM KARASH
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIE COUNTY MUNICIPALITY, STEFANI DOMITROVICH, CAROL SOUTHWORTH, in her Individual and Official Capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
