Cases 1 - 10 of 429
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
YEW v. ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2024cv06851
Plaintiff:
TONY PING YEW
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NEW JERSEY, HON. DENNIS NIEVES, HON. JOSEPH REA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
QUINTAL v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2024cv02385
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH QUINTAL
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, CHRISTOPHER ABBOTT, JARRED BURNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Marchisotto v. Juan Sanchez, et al
as 24-1922
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
SMITH v. PHILLIPS ASSCOCIATES, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
ROSETTA SMITH
Defendant:
PHILLIPS ASSOCIATES INC., PHILLIPS & ASSOCIATES INC., PHILLIPS ASSOCIATES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
MARCHISOTTO v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2024cv05870
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elmer Daniels v. City of Wilmington, et al
as 24-1808
Plaintiff:
ELMER DANIELS
Defendant:
CITY OF WILMINGTON and PHILLIP A. SAGGIONE, Esq.
JENKINS v. ARMSTRONG COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
JANET L JENKINS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG COUNTY, Warden PHILLIP SHAFFER, Doctor JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
