Cases 1 - 10 of 2,290
Marianne Sawicki v. Michael Kipphan, et al
as 24-2120
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE SAWICKI
Defendant:
MICHAEL M. KIPPHAN, LORI HEATON, RICHARD A. WILSON and others
YEW v. ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2024cv06851
Plaintiff:
TONY PING YEW
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NEW JERSEY, HON. DENNIS NIEVES, HON. JOSEPH REA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marianne Sawicki v. Michael Kipphan, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE SAWICKI
Defendant:
MICHAEL M. KIPPHAN, LORI HEATON, RICHARD A. WILSON and others
CONONIE v. BOROUGH OF WEST VIEW et al
as 2:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
PAUL-ANTHONY CONONIE
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF WEST VIEW, MICHAEL BRUNNER, RICHARD G. OPIELA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
JEESSE CALLOWAY IV v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, et al
as 2:2024cv02320
Plaintiff:
JESSE CALLOWAY, IV
Defendant:
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, TEMPLE UNIVERSITY POLICE, RICHARD M. ENGLERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
COPELAND, M.D. v. WELLS FARGO et al
as 3:2024cv06565
Plaintiff:
MARCIA COPELAND, M.D.
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO, WELLS FARGO, NA, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
