Cases 101 - 110 of 179
REAVES v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2013cv01773
Plaintiff:
REGINALD REAVES
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFFREY A. BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannon v. Melvin et al
as 1:2013cv01920
Plaintiff:
Maurice D. Cannon
Defendant:
Debrah Melvin, Rezac and Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. CARDONA et al
as 2:2013cv05504
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L. GRAHAM
Defendant:
JOHNNY CARDONA, HUDSON COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE, HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POTTS v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2013cv05164
Plaintiff:
JIMMY POTTS
Defendant:
EDWARD MCFADDEN , RON PHILLIPS , WALTER REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALVES et al v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2013cv03894
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND ALVES, THADDEUS THOMAS, RAFIEEK GRAHAM and others
Defendant:
BRUCE DAVIS, ANGEL SANTIAGO, ROBERT BUECHELE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAHAM v. CHIESA et al
as 2:2013cv03801
Plaintiff:
RAFIEEK GRAHAM
Defendant:
JEFFREY S. CHIESA and MARK SINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Anesburg et al
as 1:2013cv01621
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Anesburg, Mary McCollum, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. BARNES et al
as 3:2013cv03347
Plaintiff:
RONALD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JIM BARNES, CHARLES E. BARNES JR., GARY M. LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAHAM v. MARCELLINO et al
as 2:2013cv02785
Petitioner:
SHAROD T. GRAHAM
Respondent:
PETER F. MARCELLINO, GAIL FAIRMAN, MILTON BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reginald Falice v. USA, et al
as 13-2284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD A. FALICE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GRAHAM MULLEN, ROBERT CONRAD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
