Cases 11 - 20 of 65
ALVAREZ v. N'DIAYE
as 1:2021cv13799
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS ALVAREZ
Respondent:
LAMINE N'DIAYE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ALVAREZ v. ORTIZ
as 1:2020cv18680
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS ALVAREZ
Respondent:
DAVID ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SNIDER v. ALVAREZ et al
as 3:2020cv00241
Respondent:
Officer Heckert, C/O KILLEEN, Captain Eichenberg and others
Defendant:
ROBIN ALVAREZ and STEVENS
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JENKINS v. BOGAN et al
as 2:2020cv01115
Defendant:
SUSAN KEESLER, JAMES SCHUCK, KATE MCDERMOTT and others
Plaintiff:
DOREL JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALVAREZ-HERNANDEZ v. U.S. ATTORNEYS' OFFICE FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2019cv00221
Petitioner:
ANDRES TOMAS ALVAREZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OF THE MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and U.S. ATTORNEYS' OFFICE FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ALVAREZ v. SUPERINTENDENT OBERLANDER et al
as 2:2019cv04901
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OBERLANDER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
ROBERT ALVAREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HINTON v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2019cv00324
Defendant:
CYNTHIA LINK, CO. PAWLICKI, TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HINTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarez v. Warden
as 3:2018cv02131
Petitioner:
Juan Alvarez
Respondent:
Warden and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alvarez v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2018cv01964
Defendant:
Officer/Counselor Tharp, SIS Officer Buebendorf and Warden David J. Ebbert
Plaintiff:
Christopher Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ALVAREZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2018cv04072
Petitioner:
JOSE M. ALVAREZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN BRYAN ANTONNELLI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
