Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Adger et al v. Carney et al
as 1:2018cv02048
Plaintiff:
Joseph Crumpler, Antoine Jones, Eugene W. Wiggins and others
Defendant:
Sgt. Ronald Frederick, Lt. Justin Atherholt, Governor John Carney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SPARKS v. DELUCA et al
as 1:2018cv00175
Plaintiff:
DARELL SPARKS
Defendant:
STEVEN R. DELUCA, JUSTIN W. GRIFFITH, JAMES A. BECKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENNETT v. MAY et al
as 2:2018cv01447
Plaintiff:
SHAKREE BENNETT
Defendant:
GERALD MAY, BLANCHE CARNEY, JIM KENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAKOOR v. TAGGART et al
as 3:2018cv00045
Plaintiff:
ABDULLAH SHAKOOR
Defendant:
B. TAGGART, J. DAVENPORT, D. GRIFFITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMIREZ-TORRES v. HUGHES et al
as 1:2018cv02098
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO RAMIREZ-TORRES
Defendant:
C. RAY HUGHES, HEATHER GRIFFITH, BOBBY HYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mickey Weicksel v. Patrick Griffiths, et al
as 17-3341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICKEY A. WEICKSEL
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNSELOR KENNETH HITE, SHAWN MILLION, Sean? Saun?, ADHO DAVID MOSER and others
USA v. Andrew Griffith
as 17-1897
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDREW N. GRIFFITH
SCAFFIDI v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv00810
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SCAFFIDI
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RAY HUGHES, ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR NARDELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALSTEAD v. LANIGAN et al
as 1:2017cv00809
Plaintiff:
BRYON HALSTEAD
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, C. RAY HUGHES, NARDELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'CARROLL v. LANIGAN et al
as 1:2017cv00808
Plaintiff:
BRENDAN O'CARROLL
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, RAY HUGHES, ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR NARDELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
