Cases 41 - 50 of 101
ALBERTO v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2016cv09397
Petitioner:
RUBEN H. ALBERTO
Respondent:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, JAMES PLOUSIS, BRANDON ROSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TRICOCHE v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06102
Plaintiff:
ROSE E. TRICOCHE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOTSON et al v. TRENTON PYS. HOSPITAL'S STAFF et al
as 3:2016cv05233
Plaintiff:
JAMAL A. DOTSON, THOMAS F. KENNEDY, ALEX R. LOSCALZO and others
Defendant:
TRENTON PYS. HOSPITAL'S STAFF, ANN KLEIN FORENSIC CENTER'S STAFF, S. HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akbar v. Dauphin County Prison et al
as 3:2016cv01556
Plaintiff:
Manani Akbar
Defendant:
Dauphin County Prison, Jeffrey Haste and Emanuel Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSE v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv04028
Plaintiff:
CHESTER L ROSE, JR
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY and CFG MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03160
Plaintiff:
CARL ROSE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CAMPOVERDE v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2016cv03305
Plaintiff:
DIEGO CAMPOVERDE
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, PATRICK A. NOGAN, HELEN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSE JR. v. S.C.O. et al
as 2:2016cv03100
Plaintiff:
TROY R. ROSE JR.
Defendant:
S.C.O., PATRICK NOGAN, GARY LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROADWAY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv02601
Plaintiff:
OMAR BROADWAY
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY M. LANIGAN, COUNTY OF ESSEX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. WINGARD et al
as 3:2015cv00300
Plaintiff:
ARIDEN JACKSON
Defendant:
TREVOR A. WINGARD, MELISSA HAINSWORTH, MAZURKIEWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
