Cases 61 - 70 of 646
LEWIS v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2022cv01451
Plaintiff:
TONY SHAWN LEWIS
Defendant:
M. ZAKEN, M. DARR, J. SEIBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. HOLLOWOOD et al
as 2:2022cv01452
Plaintiff:
TONY SHAWN LEWIS
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT HOLLOWOOD, SERGEANT KOPELIC, LT HINTMEYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2022cv05807
Petitioner:
SHAQUANA LEWIS
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv03934
Plaintiff:
MAURICE LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Alton Brown v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 22-2751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM WOLF, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DR. A. SANTOS and others
Debtor / Appellee:
MINDY ANDRETTI
HARRIS et al v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2022cv03715
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARRIS, YAFEST OLIVER, CRAIG JACKSON and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY GEORGE LITTLE, FORMER SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, FORMER SECRETARY JEFFREY BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv05457
Petitioner:
SHAQUANA LEWIS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Richard Lewis v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 22-2480
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD L. LEWIS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Lewis v. Bradley
as 1:2022cv01189
Petitioner:
Kevin Lewis
Respondent:
Charles Maiorana and Warden Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LEWIS v. DOE et al
as 2:2022cv02891
Plaintiff:
ANDRE LEWIS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and MS. STICKNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
