Cases 1 - 10 of 15
BROWN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2023cv02157
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BROWN
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2020cv00349
Petitioner:
BRUCE ANTHONY BROWN
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2018cv02967
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL OVERMYER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Anthony White
as 16-4219
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY JEROME WHITE, a/k/a Dean Braithwaite, a/k/a Carlos valentine, a/k/a Anthony Brown
SANTA v. BROOKS et al
as 2:2013cv05579
Plaintiff:
JUAN SANTA
Defendant:
HOMER BROOKS, ANTHONY BROWN, ANTHONY GLASS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTA v. BROWN et al
as 2:2013cv05578
Plaintiff:
JUAN SANTA
Defendant:
ANTHONY BROWN, KENNY JACKSON, DAMISTIS ROSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv03852
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BROWN
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv03579
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BROWN
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JOHN W. KERESTES and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Brown v. Robert Maxa, et al
as 13-2265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT L. MAXA and RHONDA SHERBINE
BROWN v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2012cv07951
Petitioner:
CLIVE AMROY ANTHONY BROWN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ROY L. HENDRICKS and JOHN TSOUKARIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
