Cases 1 - 10 of 163
Nathaniel Swint v. USA, et al
as 24-2222
Defendant:
BRIAN BUSHMAN, DONNA ZICKEFOOSE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL SWINT
Kareem Millhouse v. Heath, et al
as 24-2132
Defendant:
RYAN SMITH, Case Manager, JAMES FOSNOT, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
CURRY v. IMAN et al
as 1:2024cv06556
Defendant:
SERGEANT M. DEHARO, OFFICER A. VELEZ, OFFICER C. BENNETT and others
Plaintiff:
LAQUANE CURRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merritts v. Blair County Prison et al
as 3:2024cv00108
Defendant:
Anne Frioli, ABBIE TATE, Chad Murrey and others
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Merritts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. BLOCKER et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BENNETT
Defendant:
SGT. BLOCKER, MS. MILLS, SUPT. HAINSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Merritts v. Blair County Prison et al
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Merritts
Defendant:
Blair County Prison, Prime Care Medical, Inc., Abbie Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSS v. FBI et al
as 2:2023cv05025
Plaintiff:
ALI L. CROSS
Defendant:
FBI, SECRET SERVICE, BENNETT JOSHUA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KAUFFMAN v. SMITH et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kareem Millhouse v. Suzanne Heath, et al
as 23-1333
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Defendant / Appellee:
SUZANNE V. HEATH, JAMES FOSNOT, DAVID EBBERT and others
BENNETT v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2023cv00579
Petitioner:
VERNON BENNETT
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
