Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Gill v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00922
Petitioner:
Joseph Gill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CORBETT v. RIDDLE et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. CORBETT, DANIEL STEVEN JAMES STRANG-GILL, DANIEL STEVEN STRANG and others
Defendant:
LT. RIDDLE, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv01718
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, George Little, Secretary of Department of Corrections, TABE BICKELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00017
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
EASLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, OBERLANDER, SARATELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ORTIZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv03100
Plaintiff:
ANDY ORTIZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY, PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Desmond v. Klopp et al
as 1:2020cv00135
Defendant:
Justin Atherholt, John Doe, Michael Stafford and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Desmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHILLIPS v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2019cv00382
Defendant:
NURSE MURRAY, LIEUTENANT S.A. GATTO, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RUSSELL and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS CLAY PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
EASLEY v. REUBERG et al
as 1:2019cv00223
Defendant:
REUBERG, ADAMS, SAWTELLI and others
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HILL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv00960
Defendant:
DR. RAMIREZ, ROBERT GILMORE, BRITTNY CHIAVETTI and others
Plaintiff:
LAVOND A HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
