Cases 1 - 10 of 52
WALLACE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HARRY, L. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE HILL
Defendant:
WARDEN RANDY IRWIN, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, SERGEANT J.T. KRAFCZYNSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HERBERT v. ASSOCIATE WARDEN et al
as 2:2023cv21377
Plaintiff:
OLAJUWON HERBERT
Defendant:
ASSOCIATE WARDEN, WARDEN, REGINA MARROW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Williams v. Wetzel, et al
as 23-1562
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN W. WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, THOMAS PLACEY, COMMON PLEAS JUDGE, EDWARD E. GUIDO, PRESIDENT JUDGE and others
HAYES v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2022cv02580
Plaintiff:
IDRIYS HAYES
Defendant:
E. THOMAS, K. MYERS, Z. HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, BARRY R. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Akinbayo et al
as 1:2022cv00099
Petitioner:
Micah J. Smith
Respondent:
Kolawole Akinbayo and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00786
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, LOIS ALLEN, MARK CAPPOZZA and others
Plaintiff:
PARIS L. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SMITH et al v. POLLACK et al
as 5:2019cv05343
Defendant:
JOHN ADAMS, BERKS COUNTY, JAMES A. POLLACK and others
Plaintiff:
KALEY E. DAMORE, VINCENT J. SMITH and BAIL SHOP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACKSTONE v. WRIGHT et al
as 2:2019cv00585
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BLACKSTONE
Defendant:
SGT IHOFF, CO WOMBROSKI, CO J. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
