Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Smith v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00854
Petitioner:
James Richard Smith, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SMITH v. BERRINGER et al
as 1:2022cv00272
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. SMITH
Defendant:
CO1 BERRINGER, MS. KERSINICK and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2022cv00973
Petitioner:
JAMES THOMAS SMITH
Respondent:
ERIC ARMEL, JOSH SHAPIRO and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. de Barrena-Sarobe et al
as 1:2021cv01548
Plaintiff:
James R. Smith
Defendant:
Christopher L. de Barrena-Sarobe, David Pugh, Eleni Kousoulis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. S.C.I. BENNER TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2018cv00542
Plaintiff:
James R. Smith
Defendant:
SCI Benner Township and Rickey L. Sherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. S.C.I. BENNER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2017cv01606
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. SMITH
Defendant:
S.C.I. BENNER TOWNSHIP and RICKEY L. SHERMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
James Smith v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 17-1979
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MELVIN SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SUPERINTENDENT GRATERFORD SCI
SMITH v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06012
Plaintiff:
JAMES S. SMITH
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. BONDS et al
as 2:2015cv07069
Petitioner:
JAMES LEE SMITH
Respondent:
WILLIE BONDS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. BONDS et al
as 2:2015cv06437
Petitioner:
JAMES LEE SMITH
Respondent:
WILLIE BONDS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
