Cases 1 - 10 of 27
HERBERT v. OFFICER ALVEREZ et al
as 2:2021cv12491
Plaintiff:
OLAJUWON HERBERT
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, OFFICER ALVERZE, WARDEN/DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GLAZEWSKI v. HICKS et al
as 1:2021cv02408
Respondent:
JOHN ROES, 1-10, JOHN DOES, 1-10, MARCUS O. HICKS and others
Petitioner:
VINCENT W. GLAZEWSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 13-1098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
ROE v. NICOLETTI et al
as 2:2012cv01509
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROE
Defendant:
HARRY NICOLETTI, JR. , KEVIN FREISS, TORY KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 11-3956
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
BAYLOR v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2011cv06413
Plaintiff:
TROY BAYLOR
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DEPUTY ____PIERCE, DEPUTY _______ TARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRALL v. BOCCHINI et al
as 1:2010cv01228
Plaintiff:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS, PHYLLIS OLIVER, MICHELLE R. RICCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEARSE v. NOTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2008cv03628
Plaintiff:
RONDEL J. KEARSE
Defendant:
NOTHAMPTON COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., WILLIAM SPRAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MEUSA v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2008cv03291
Plaintiff:
TROY A. MEUSA
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL , INC., WILLIAM SPRAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HARRIS v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2008cv03142
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN HARRIS
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL , INC., WILLIAM SPRAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
