Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Reed v. Garza et al
as 1:2023cv01471
Petitioner:
Robert Reed
Respondent:
F. Garza and Lynn Leibovitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FENNELL v. PIROZZOLA et al
as 3:2019cv00097
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FENNELL
Defendant:
DAVID CLOSE, KENNETH HOLLIBAUGH, LONNIE OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JONES v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2018cv10189
Plaintiff:
RICCO N. JONES
Defendant:
MATTHEW MURPHY, MATTHEW KATZENBACH, ROBERT REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2017cv01520
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2016cv02280
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffery A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2015cv01959
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
Robert Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Richardson v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 13-4093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, SGT. APODACA, ROBERT REED, Hearing Examiner and others
POLANCO v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2013cv00123
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL POLANCO
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, STEVEN R. GLUNT, CAPTAIN BRUMBAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. BURNS et al
as 1:2013cv00110
Petitioner:
ERIC RICHARDSON
Respondent:
DANIEL P. BURNS, APODACA, ROBERT REED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hector Borrero v. Steven Glunt, et al
as 13-1530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HECTOR BORRERO
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN GLUNT, SUPERINTENDENT, SCI HOUTZDALE, DAVID CLOSE, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT, SCI HOUTZDALE, DAVID KESSLING, FORMER DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT CENTRALIZED SERVICES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
