Cases 1 - 10 of 1,694
Allen, Jr. v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv01536
Defendant:
Dental Department at SCI-Mahanoy, SCI-Mahanoy, Keri Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Thurmond Allen, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Sheriff et al
as 2:2024cv04285
Plaintiff:
Waliyd A Muhammad
Defendant:
COI SHERIFF and Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
FREE v. DIAMOND PHARMACY SERVICES
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
ALAN FREE
Defendant:
DIAMOND PHARMACY SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Zumar DuBose, et al v. Attorney General United States of America, et al
as 24-2425
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR DUBOSE, ABDUSH DUBOSE and KARIEM BASEER DUBOSE
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP and ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DUBOSE v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2024cv03436
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, F.D.C. PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR DUBOSE, ABDUSH DUBOSE and KARIEM DUBOSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman Williams, Jr. v. Jamey Luther, et al
as 24-2391
Plaintiff:
NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
JAMES MAIMONE, Registered Nurse, ANGELA SAYLOR, Registered Nurse, JAMEY LUTHER, Superintendent and others
Quinn v. WellPath Medical Services et al
as 3:2024cv01248
Defendant:
Department of Corrections Collegiate Board Members, RN Supervisor Blanche Milo, Geisinger Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HESTER v. BLINKEN et al
as 3:2024cv07964
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK TYRONE HESTER
Defendant:
ANTHONY BLINKEN and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
