Cases 1 - 10 of 49
VILLAFANA v. MORGAN et al
as 2:2022cv04454
Plaintiff:
YASIN VILLAFANA
Defendant:
JOSEPH J. MORGAN, LT. BELL, STG. COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENRY v. FERRELL et al
as 2:2021cv01322
Respondent:
MITCHEAL FERRELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPJIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
DWAYNE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MOORE v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ROSA et al
as 2:2021cv00933
Defendant:
MICHELLE FERRELL, JOHN DOE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SGT. MILES and others
Plaintiff:
NAIEEM MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JORDAN-BEY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2020cv03608
Defendant:
RACHEL ECHMENDIA D/B/A DEFENSE ATTORNEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS, TIMIKA LANE D/B/A COMMON PLEAS JUDGE OF PENNSYLVANIA PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
SHARIF JORDAN-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferrell v. Thompson
as 1:2020cv00296
Defendant:
Doctor Troy Thompson
Plaintiff:
Jaquan Ferrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERRELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv00465
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
SEAN FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ROGERS v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2019cv04921
Defendant:
ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK, EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER MONTGOMERY, SHERRI JONES and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERRELL v. WARDEN OF FCI MCKEAN
as 1:2018cv00335
Respondent:
WARDEN OF FCI MCKEAN
Petitioner:
SEBASTIAN FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ferrell v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2018cv01835
Defendant:
Dr. Paul Noel, RNS Kimberly Minarchick, Correct Care Solutions and others
Plaintiff:
Quinzell Ferrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SKINNER v. COLLAZO et al
as 3:2015cv08546
Plaintiff:
RAHMIR SKINNER
Defendant:
I. COLLAZO, FERRELL and SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
