Cases 101 - 110 of 204
KELLOGG v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2018cv09048
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN J. KELLOGG
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENEA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MERCK & CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THEOBALD v. KNORR-BREMSE AG et al
as 2:2018cv00526
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN THEOBALD
Defendant:
KNORR-BREMSE AG, KNORR BRAKE COMPANY, NEW YORK AIR BRAKE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2018cv00868
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Attorney General's Office, Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TALLEY v. WETZEL, et al
as 2:2018cv00476
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant:
TAMMY FERGUSON, RODNEY CHISM, DAVID LINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company v. Falcon et al
as 3:2018cv00493
Plaintiff:
Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
David Falcon, James J. Shappell, Rick Houser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ETZWEILER v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2017cv00327
Petitioner:
DUSTIN ETZWEILER
Respondent:
M.D. OVERMYER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF DAUPHIN COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOBO et al v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2017cv03968
Plaintiff:
MADLYNE BOBO , EMA HERNANDEZ , RONALD HUGHES and others
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RETTEW v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2017cv02957
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN L. RETTEW
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY , PAUL K. SMEAL , EVAN MARIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCorkle v. Scott et al
as 1:2017cv01077
Plaintiff:
Dustin McCorkle
Defendant:
Fred Scott , Shippensburg Police Department and Unknown Officers One, Two, and Three
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Molcon v. Graterford Prison et al
as 4:2017cv00905
Plaintiff:
Michael Molcon
Defendant:
Graterford Prison, Natal, Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
