Cases 101 - 110 of 690
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BEY v. YEADON POLICE OFFICER DOUGHERTY 4635 et al
as 2:2021cv03179
Plaintiff:
FREEMAN BEY
Defendant:
YEADON POLICE OFFICER DOUGHERTY 4635, SEIPLES COLLISION and YEADON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Reardon v. State of New Jersey, et al
as 21-2311
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN E. REARDON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JUDGE FREEMAN, of Camden County, JUDGE PUGLIESE, of Camden County and others
USA v. Deleon Freeman
as 21-2211
Defendant / Appellant:
DELEON FREEMAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FREEMAN v. SAUL
as 2:2021cv00825
Plaintiff:
BRENDA FREEMAN and BRENDA MACK
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
ROBINSON v. FREEMAN, MATHIS & GARY, LLP et al
as 2:2021cv02875
Defendant:
FREEMAN, MATHIS & GARY, LLP, JOHN DOE OR JANE DOE, WESLEY CALVIN JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARANTE et al v. KELEMEN et al
as 2:2021cv13013
Plaintiff:
NO PLACE INN, INC. (d/b/a Buddys Place), BUDDYS REALTY, CO., JOSEPH MARANTE and others
Defendant:
MARY ELLEN MURPHY, CONSUELO CARPENTER, ROBERT ROBBINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leslie Blakey v. Kevin Pistro, et al
as 21-2202
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN PISTRO, WARDEN, OFFICER FREEMAN and OFFICER LEROY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESLIE C. BLAKEY
MARKFERDING SENIOR et al v. MARKFERDING et al
as 2:2021cv12860
Plaintiff:
DAVID L MARKFERDING SENIOR, D. C. M., D. L. M. JUNIOR and others
Defendant:
FRANCIS NICOTRA, DELLA M MARKFERDING, MARIE MARIELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
