Cases 101 - 110 of 564
Chempakaseril v. Mercy Catholic Medical Center - Mercy Fitzgerald Campus
as 2:2021cv03531
Plaintiff:
Shaila Chempakaseril
Defendant:
Mercy Catholic Medical Center - Mercy Fitzgerald Campus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
FITZGERALD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2021cv13277
Plaintiff:
DARA A FITZGERALD
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Frederick Banks v. United States Marshal Service, et al
as 21-2049
Defendant / Appellee:
ORLANDO HARPER, Warden Allegheny County Jail, CASE MANAGER SCHENK, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
ANDERSON v. ENGLERT et al
as 2:2021cv00620
Defendant:
KOZLOWSKI, RICHARD FITZGERALD, PENDELL and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN L. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
FITZGERALD v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02087
Plaintiff:
CAROL FITZGERALD
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MCKESSON CORPORATION and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KIRK v. CAULFIELD et al
as 2:2021cv00556
Defendant:
LISA V. CAULFIELD, RICH FITZGERALD, THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
DEANTHONY KIRK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WARDLAW v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv01942
Defendant:
UNDERWOOD SELBY, MELANIE HARRIS, ELIZABETH ESTRADA and others
Plaintiff:
EXAVIER L. WARDLAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01771
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Watson v. Fitzgerald
as 1:2021cv00232
Defendant:
Craig R. Fitzgerald
Plaintiff:
Eddie V. Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NORTHINGTON v. PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv06338
Defendant:
OFFICER JEFFREY GALAZKA, OFFICER BROWN, OFFICER RICHARD NICOLETTI and others
Plaintiff:
JAMEL NORTHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
