Cases 101 - 110 of 212
MARQUEZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv01284
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MARQUEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , ERIC BURKE , JOHN DOE 1, POLICE OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Williams et al
as 4:2013cv02762
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Dixon
Defendant:
Roger Williams, John Doe, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAWSON v. COUNTY OF DELAWARE et al
as 2:2013cv05413
Plaintiff:
NEONZA C. DAWSON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF DELAWARE , JOSEPH F. MCGINN , DEPUTY SHERIFF JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. JOHN DOE #1 et al
as 2:2013cv03182
Plaintiff:
GEORGE COLEMAN
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARRETT v. LINDSAY et al
as 2:2013cv02874
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ALI GARRETT
Defendant:
CAMERON LINDSAY, FELTON, ATKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CALHOUN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv01874
Plaintiff:
RONALD CALHOUN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHARLES RAMSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SUDLER v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2013cv01491
Plaintiff:
DUANE SUDLER
Defendant:
BENSALEM TOWNSHIP , BENSALEM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT , FREDERICK HARRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRAGG v. MISZAC et al
as 3:2013cv01193
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH BRAGG
Defendant:
MISZAC, C. JAMES, STEVE DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Forrest v. Debra Sauers, et al
as 13-1389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, MAURIN, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Hill v. Bethea et al
as 3:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
Howard L. Hill, II
Defendant:
D. Bethea, R. Danchise, G. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
