Cases 101 - 110 of 412
DORVAL v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, TREASURY DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2020cv05997
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 6-10, JOHN DOES 1-5, JOHN FURDA and others
Plaintiff:
JEAN L DORVAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GAY v. LORI et al
as 3:2020cv00085
Defendant:
SGT. LORI, JOHN DOE #5, C/O ORBASH and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE GAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SATTERLEE v. LYFT, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv03519
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE SATTERLEE
Defendant:
LYFT, INC., LOGISTICARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, JOHN DOES 6-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FITZPATRICK v. TOWNSHIP OF HAZLET et al
as 3:2020cv01779
Defendant:
ROBERT J. DICKENS, JOHN DOES 6-10, MICHAEL DUNCAN and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW S. FITZPATRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEVLIN v. LACEY TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2020cv04068
Defendant:
DIMITRIOS TSARNAS, JOHN DOES 6-10, JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
PAIGE E. DEVLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON v. WALMART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 1:2020cv02450
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 6-10, ABC CORPS. 1-5, JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
TOGNO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2020cv00386
Defendant:
GAETANO DESAPIO, SALVATORE DESAPIO & SONS (A PARTNERSHIP), JOHN DOE 6-10 (SAID NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS) and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA J TOGNO and PATRICIA J. TOGNO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv21549
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DOZIER v. EAST MANUFACTURING CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv21378
Defendant:
EAST MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, GENESIS TRAILERS, INC, WILKIE TRUCKING, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DOZIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
