Cases 101 - 110 of 251
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ARMSTRONG DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES, INC. v. SG ELLISON et al
as 2:2013cv01590
Plaintiff:
ARMSTRONG DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES, INC.
Defendant:
SG ELLISON , PETER G. SHIMKUS , BRANDON M. STEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
TELZER v. BOROUGH OF ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS et al
as 2:2013cv04306
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TELZER
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS, ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS POLICE DEPARTMENT, MICHAEL CIOFFI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drummond et al v. Harry et al
as 1:2013cv01891
Plaintiff:
Gerald Drummond and Michael Burkhart
Defendant:
Laurel R. Harry, J. Meintel, T. Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv03985
Plaintiff:
EDWIN SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN MCDERMOTT, STEPHEN VIVARINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FENTON v. MCDERMOTT
as 2:2013cv00741
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL J. FENTON
Defendant:
MARK MCDERMOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Joseph McDermott v. Pickins, et al
as 13-1368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH MCDERMOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
PICKINS, SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Rochester v. Southers et al
as 1:2012cv02291
Plaintiff:
Faheem Rochester
Defendant:
Richard Southers, Whalen, Wendy Depew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shakur v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2012cv02208
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Tabb Bickell, R. Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. PETTINE et al
as 2:2012cv05608
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WOODS
Defendant:
CARMEN D. PETTINE, DANIEL WALLOWER, JERE GOODMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
