Cases 121 - 130 of 738,533
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Arias v. Arviza
as 3:2024cv00829
Petitioner:
Dalnovis Delarosa Arias
Respondent:
Warden Arviza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taber-Cayer et al v. Persinger
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Dawn Taber-Cayer and Michael Cayer
Defendant:
Jeffrey L Persinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ROBERTS v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.O.C. et al
as 1:2024cv05872
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luxer Corporation v. ButterflyMX, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Luxer Corporation
Defendant:
ButterflyMX, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Luxer Corporation v. Package Concierge, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Luxer Corporation
Defendant:
Package Concierge, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
USA v. Kalief Ladson
as 24-1929
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KALIEF LADSON, a/k/a Kalief A. Ladson
John Marchisotto v. Juan Sanchez, et al
as 24-1922
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Joseph Lukuta, III v. Lena Angelella, et al
as 24-1902
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LUKUTA, III, Individually doing business as Lokuta's Garage Coporation
Defendant:
LENA ANGELELLA, Chief of Police, Pittston Township Police Department, DAVID SLEZAK, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Pittston Township, JOSEPH HAWK, Vice Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Pittston Township and others
Rashonna Ransom v. GreatPlains Finance LLC, et al
as 24-1908
Plaintiff:
RASHONNA M. RANSOM, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated
Defendant:
GREATPLAINS FINANCE LLC, DBA Cash Advance Now
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
