Cases 11 - 20 of 17,776
Allen, Jr. v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv01536
Defendant:
Dental Department at SCI-Mahanoy, SCI-Mahanoy, Keri Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Thurmond Allen, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON-WALKER v. M.C.C.F et al
as 2:2024cv04828
Defendant:
CERT SGT. STABILE, M.C.C.F, MAJOR MORYER and others
Plaintiff:
ZUNIR WILSON-WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04720
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
BELL v. SMITH et al
as 1:2024cv00244
Defendant:
RON SMITH and CAROL SMITH
Plaintiff:
ROBIN R. BELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
DRUMMOND v. DIETRICH et al
as 1:2024cv00245
Defendant:
J. BLICHA, S. KOPCHICK, I. GUSTAFSON and others
Plaintiff:
RASHEEM JAMES DRUMMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bittan et al v. BBG, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01008
Defendant:
BBG, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patrick Smith, Bruce Bittan and Jack Enright
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
BIBBS-SMITH v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2024cv04645
Plaintiff:
TANYA BIBBS-SMITH
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04611
Plaintiff:
HEATHER SMITH
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. AHUJA et al
as 3:2024cv08842
Plaintiff:
MARIAH SMITH
Defendant:
DR. CHANDAN AHUJA and STEPHANIE EKEMEZIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
SUTTON v. FAIRMONT HEALTH SYSTEM INC. et al
as 2:2024cv08861
Defendant:
KENYATLA STEWART, FAIRMONT HEALTH SYSTEM INC., MRS. SHELTON and others
Plaintiff:
VIVIENNE SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
