Cases 11 - 20 of 67
BERTOLETTE v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
JOHN BERTOLETTE
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, LAUREL HARRY, TABB BICKELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WELTY v. HINTEMEYER et al
as 2:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WELTY
Defendant:
ERIC HINTEMEYER, MARTIN SWITZER, STEPHEN BUZAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ROTEN v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
ISIAH ANDREW ROTEN
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, TABB BICKELL, MICHAEL ZAKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SWITZER v. COMMOWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al.
as 1:2022cv00363
Plaintiff:
KERRY LEE SWITZER, JR.
Defendant:
COMMOWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, BRENDA SERVIDIO, JERI LOUISE BOLTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SWITZER v. VENANGO COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
KERRY LEE SWITZER, JR.
Defendant:
VENANGO COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WELTY v. RITENOUR et al
as 2:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WELTY
Defendant:
MR. RITENOUR, MS. NOEL, MS. HEATON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SWITZER v. FRANKLIN INVESTMENT CORP
as 1:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
KERRY L. SWITZER, JR.
Defendant:
FRANKLIN INVESTMENT CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SWITZER v. FRANKLIN INVESTMENT CORP
as 1:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
KERRY LEE SWITZER, JR.
Defendant:
FRANKLIN INVESTMENT CORP and CORTECH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SWITZER v. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE (PA)
as 1:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
KERRY L. SWITZER, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POST OFFICE (PA)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Madison et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00830
Plaintiff:
Jon Madison, Shannon Mahurin, Sharon Malone and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
