Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Brown v. Price et al
as 3:2019cv00079
Defendant:
P.A. King, Dr. Kollman, Paula Price and others
Plaintiff:
Gartor Kiki Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Gildea et al
as 3:2018cv01527
Defendant:
P.A. Eric, P.A. Gonnes, CO Sposito and others
Plaintiff:
Gartor Kiki Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRICE v. RESIDENTIAL DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM
as 1:2017cv07095
Petitioner:
SHEIK NAIEEM TRICE
Respondent:
RESIDENTIAL DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Eric Greene v. Superintendent Smithfield SCI, et al
as 16-3636
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC GREENE, AKA Jarmaine Q. Trice
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SMITHFIELD SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
TRICE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03818
Petitioner:
WAYNE TRICE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
LEBLANC v. TRICE et al
as 5:2016cv01044
Petitioner:
DONNELLY J. LEBLANC
Respondent:
ERIC TRICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Trice v. Harrington Police Department, et al
as 15-3053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM R. TRICE
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, LT. ERIC MALONEY, OFFICER KEITH B. SHYERS and others
MILLER et al v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2015cv00288
Defendant:
THOMPSON, JOHN DOE #5, MR. MICHEAL LEFEBVRE and others
Plaintiff:
MILLER, CHERYL ANN MILLER and ROBERT STEVEN BELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
TRICE et al v. BROWN et al
as 2:2015cv00741
Plaintiff:
VERONICA TRICE , DONTY'A LOWERY , MARAY'A EPPS and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS KEE, ALBERT FORD, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
