Cases 11 - 20 of 45
In re: Alexander Ivchenko v. Nancy Isaacson
as 20-2858
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER IVCHENKO
Debtor / Appellee:
In re: NATIONWIDE AMBULANCE SERVICES INC
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY ISAACSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv18584
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
James Evans v. Mercy Suburban Hospital, et al
as 16-3285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCY SUBURBAN HOSPITAL, TOWNE MANOR EAST NURSING HOME & REHABILITATION CENTER, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NATIONWIDE AMBULANCE SERVICES, INC. v. BURWELL et al
as 2:2015cv02505
Plaintiff:
NATIONWIDE AMBULANCE SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATTHEWS BURWELL and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SINCLAIR et al
as 3:2014cv00561
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
HELEN I. SINCLAIR, PETER AND JOAN CZAJKOWSKI, ALERT AMBULANCE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
PONKO v. MUTUAL AID AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2013cv00765
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A. PONKO
Defendant:
MUTUAL AID AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
NATIONWIDE AMBULANCE SERVICES, INC. v. SEBELIUS
as 2:2012cv06147
Plaintiff:
NATIONWIDE AMBULANCE SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
