Cases 11 - 20 of 5,819
HABIB et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 2:2024cv05923
Plaintiff:
EMAD HABIB, VIVIAN MESHRKY, ANDREW HABIB and others
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Decker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01932
Plaintiff:
Andrew Decker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Andrew Podems v. Union County Child Support Enforcement Unit, et al
as 24-1811
Plaintiff:
ANDREW M. PODEMS
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT UNIT, THERESA E. MULLER, Hearing Officer (spelling Muller?), JAMES HELY, Hearing Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc, et al
as 24-1775
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Esq.
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC, DOW INC, CORTEVA INC and others
Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc, et al
as 24-1774
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Esq.
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC, DOW INC, CORTEVA INC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
DORIN v. EXSCIENTIA P.L.C. et al
as 1:2024cv05692
Plaintiff:
ORINDO DORIN
Defendant:
EXSCIENTIA P.L.C., ANDREW HOPKINS, BEN R. TAYLOR and others
LOMBARDO V. ZANELLI, ET AL
as 5:2024cv01806
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE AMY ZANELLI, ANDREW YOST, MATTHEW STEIDEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
