Cases 11 - 20 of 183
Liptok v. City of Pottsville, PA, et al
as 3:2023cv01303
Plaintiff:
John J. Liptok
Defendant:
City Of Pottsville Pa., et al, City Council, Dorothy Botto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIPTOK v. CITY OF POTTSVILLE PA., ET AL
as 2:2023cv02942
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. LIPTOK
Defendant:
CITY OF POTTSVILLE PA., ET AL, CITY COUNCIL, DOROTHY BOTTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emery Barron v. Wetzel, et al
as 23-1699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMERY BARRON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS (DOC/PA), KEVIN RANSOM, WARDEN OF SCI-DALLAS, S. MILLER, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT FOR CENTRALIZED SERVICE and others
Higgins v. Barron et al
as 1:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
Alison Higgins
Defendant:
Michael Barron and Natalie Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
KAETZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2023cv02021
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JUDGE KEVIN MCNULTY, JUDGE CLAIRE C. CECCHI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARRON v. THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
AMY BARRON
Defendant:
THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Ent v. Barron Glez Trucking, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
William Ent
Defendant:
Barron Glez Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Wagner v. Mifflin County Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Marhsall T. Wagner and Marshall T. Wagner
Defendant:
Mifflin County Pennsylvania, Dave Barron, Rick Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kittrell v. Miller et al
as 1:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Ulyessie Kittrell
Defendant:
Jack Miller, Jonathan Reed, Kent Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
