Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Jevon Everett v. Nort, et al
as 14-1592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEVON EVERETT
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER NORT, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PINDEL, ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL and others
Jimi Rose v. County of York, et al
as 13-4712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMI ROSE
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF YORK, COUNTY OF ADAMS, RICHARD K. RENN and others
CARTER et al v. HARPER et al
as 2:2013cv01252
Plaintiff:
DEERING CARTER and DAJON SMITH
Defendant:
HARPER, CHAPLAIN, DEMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. York County et al
as 1:2013cv02056
Plaintiff:
Jimi Rose
Defendant:
York County, Adams County, Richard K. Renn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. UNIT MANAGER ZOBAYTNE, A BLOCK et al
as 3:2013cv01508
Plaintiff:
Brian Anderson
Defendant:
Unit Manager Zobaytne, A Block, Cheryl L. Chronister, Laural Harry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chronister v. Fleming et al
as 1:2013cv01235
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Chronister
Defendant:
Janet Fleming, Samuel Miles , Michael Schiffhauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANDERSON v. UNIT MANAGER ZOBAYTNE, A BLOCK et al
as 2:2013cv00475
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ANDERSON
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER ZOBAYTNE, A BLOCK, CHERYL L. CHRONISTER, LAURAL HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Chronister et al
as 1:2012cv00393
Plaintiff:
Santos Ramos Rodriguez
Defendant:
John H. Chronister, John S. Kennedy, Seamus D. Dubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Souleman v. Chronister et al
as 3:2012cv00154
Plaintiff:
Hamadi Hamid Souleman
Defendant:
Steve Chronister, Doug Hoke, Domer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Richard Hammond
as 11-3434
Petitioner - Petitioner:
In re: RICHARD A. HAMMONDS
Respondent:
RANDY JUSTICE, KOVAC, MAXWELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
