Cases 11 - 20 of 39
CARROLL v. HARVEY et al
as 2:2020cv00069
Plaintiff:
REGINALD CARROLL
Defendant:
OFFICER CORNISH and OFFICER HARVEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORNISH v. DELL RETIREMENT SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv02730
Plaintiff:
VICTORA CORNISH
Defendant:
DELL RETIREMENT SERVICES, INC. and SHANNONDELL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Fatir et al v. Phelps et al
as 1:2018cv00933
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir, Malachai DeBruce, Antonio R. Bailey and others
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Dana Metzger, Jane Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORNISH v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS, L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv07924
Plaintiff:
IVORY CORNISH
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS, L.P., ASTRAZENECA LP and MERCK & CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CORNISH v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED et al
as 2:2018cv03519
Plaintiff:
MARY CORNISH
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CORNISH v. WAL-MART STORES INC. et al
as 1:2018cv02890
Plaintiff:
VERNA CORNISH
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC. , JOHN DOE #1-10 and ABC CORP. #1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CORNISH v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv00920
Plaintiff:
DAWN MARIE CORNISH
Defendant:
NANCY BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ALEXANDER et al v. JACKSON et al
as 2:2016cv01714
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE ALEXANDER , CHRISTIAN REYES and TANIA BARREIRO
Defendant:
ANTHONY JACKSON , WARNER, GORMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORNISH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, (PICC) et al
as 2:2014cv06920
Plaintiff:
JOHN CORNISH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, (PICC) , WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. , PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
