Cases 11 - 20 of 149
Smith, Jr. v. Zanic et al
as 1:2022cv00609
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
George N. Zanic and David G. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NICOLL v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2022cv02336
Petitioner:
DAVID G NICOLL
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Mr. MICHAEL CARVAJAL and ALIX M MCLEAREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stockton v. Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00114
Petitioner:
Ronald Terell Stockton
Respondent:
Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Superintendent of SCI-Coal Township, David G. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sawicki v. Kipphan et al
as 1:2021cv02031
Plaintiff:
Marianne Sawicki
Defendant:
Michael M. Kipphan, Lori Heaton, Richard A. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Robinson v. Palco, et al
as 21-2987
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
PALCO, DIetary Staff, HIXSON, Dietary Staff, BIAN, C.O. and others
Kent v. Lydall, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01243
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Lydall, Inc., David G. Bills, James J. Cannon and others
CICCOTELLI v. CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03708
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC., TIMOTHY B PAGE, KATHRYN G JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
DAVYDOV v. CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03755
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVYDOV
Defendant:
CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC., TIMOTHY B PAGE, KATHRYN G JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
CICCOTELLI v. LYDALL INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03784
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
LYDALL INC., MARC T. GILES, SARA A GREENSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
