Cases 11 - 20 of 83
Garfield v. Hankowsky et al
as 1:2020cv00027
Defendant:
Katherine Dietze, Antonio Fernandez, Prologis, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Garfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garfield v. Hankowsky et al
as 1:2020cv00019
Defendant:
Katherine Dietze, Antonio Fernandez, Prologis, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Garfield
MCDONOUGH v. LIBERTY PROPERTY TRUST et al
as 2:2019cv21582
Defendant:
KATHERINE DIETZE, DANIEL P. GARTON, ROBERT G. GIFFORD and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MCDONOUGH
Thompson v. Liberty Property Trust et al
as 1:2019cv02230
Defendant:
Katherine Dietze, William Hankowsky, Lambda OP Acquisition LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Christian DeLoach v. Administrator East Jersey Stat, et al
as 17-1780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTIAN DELOACH
Defendant - Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
DELOACH v. PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT. et al
as 2:2015cv02962
Plaintiff:
EDWARD DELOACH
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., BRIAN TEUDER, OFFICE OF THE PROTHONOTARY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DELOACH v. SMITH et al
as 2:2015cv02338
Petitioner:
BRAETTA DELOACH
Respondent:
ROBERT SMITH, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DELOACH v. KML LAW GROUP et al
as 2:2015cv01106
Plaintiff:
EDWARD DELOACH
Defendant:
VICTORIA W. CHEN, MICHAEL MCKEEVER, ALYK L. OFLAZIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv01040
Plaintiff:
DAMIAN SMITH , LISA GREGORY , GARY ROBINSON and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY WALKER, LOUIS CUJDIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
