Cases 11 - 20 of 2,735
KANTH v. PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
as 3:2024cv06848
Plaintiff:
DR. RAJANI KANTH
Defendant:
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VIFOR (INTERNATIONAL) AG et al v. DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. et al
as 2:2024cv06833
Plaintiff:
VIFOR (INTERNATIONAL) AG and AMERICAN REGENT, INC.
Defendant:
DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. and DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
VIFOR (INTERNATIONAL) AG et al v. DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. et al
as 3:2024cv06833
Plaintiff:
VIFOR (INTERNATIONAL) AG and AMERICAN REGENT, INC.
Defendant:
DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. and DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
EISAI R&D MANAGEMENT CO., LTD. et al v. DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv06765
Plaintiff:
EISAI R&D MANAGEMENT CO., LTD., EISAI CO., LTD., EISAI MANUFACTURING LTD. and others
Defendant:
DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC. and DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
SMITH v. WELLPATH et al
as 2:2024cv02520
Plaintiff:
ERIC SMITH
Defendant:
WELLPATH, DR. ANNINO, DR. LETIZIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. LETIZIO et al
as 2:2024cv02463
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN COOPER
Defendant:
MEDICAL DIRECTOR LETIZIO, E. CALIGURI, WELL PATH/CORRECT CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NASH v. PHILA DISTRICT ATTY et al
as 2:2024cv02437
Plaintiff:
AASIM NASH
Defendant:
PHILA DISTRICT ATTY, PHILA PUB. DEF. and NEW VITAE DR. BEHR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Longo, Jr. v. Hannah Trostle, et al
as 24-1981
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. LONGO, JR.
Defendant:
HANNAH TROSTLE, RNS, SCI-Camp Hill, MR.. ARQUELLES, SCI-Camp Hill and DR. VOORSTAD, SCI-Camp Hill
Matthew Jones v. Fouad El Chidiak
as 24-1950
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
DR. FOUAD EL CHIDIAK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
