Cases 11 - 20 of 72
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. PUGH
as 2:2023cv02004
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Defendant:
BRYANT PATRICK PUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCNEIL v. PASCUZZI et al
as 2:2023cv01725
Plaintiff:
HERBERT MCNEIL
Defendant:
ASHLEY M. PASCUZZI, GROSS POLOWY LLC., JODI ALPHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
James Burress v. Freedom Mortgage Corp
as 22-2543
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES BURRESS, on behalf of himself and the putative class
Defendant / Appellee:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORP, a New Jersey Corporation
Rayfield-Bey v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 1:2022cv01073
Plaintiff:
verlyn-teresa: rayfield-bey
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company, Charles W. Scharf, Lorraine Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
THORNTON et al v. STATE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANIES et al
as 1:2022cv00215
Plaintiff:
LANCE THORNTON and SUSAN MULLOOLY
Defendant:
STATE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANIES, MILBANK INSURANCE COMPANY, FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
