Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Fitzgerald v. Jones
as 1:2017cv00998
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Fitzgerald
Defendant: Brandi K. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WINTERS et al v. JONES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv09020
Plaintiff: JEFFREY A. WINTERS and COLLECTION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Defendant: JOSEPH K. JONES , ESQ. , BENJAMIN J. WOLF, ESQ. , JONES, WOLF & KAPASI LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00058
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JONES v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv06914
Plaintiff: KAREN K JONES
Defendant: DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO US HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIBSON v. COBURN et al
as 2:2015cv04335
Plaintiff: STEVEN GIBSON
Defendant: D. COBURN, K. JONES, RAMIREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. COBURN et al
as 1:2015cv04335
Plaintiff: STEVEN GIBSON
Defendant: D. COBURN, K. JONES, RAMIREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. COBURN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv03026
Plaintiff: STEVEN GIBSON
Defendant: D COBURN, K JONES, RAMIREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levar Jones v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 15-1830
Plaintiff - Appellant: LEVAR K. JONES
Defendant - Appellee: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, SUPERINTENDENT SMITHFIELD SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Levar K. Jone
as 15-1611
Petitioner: In re: LEVAR K. JONES
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
EGGER et al v. RUNNELLS SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL OF UNION COUNTY
as 2:2014cv03904
Plaintiff: BARBARA EGGER , DESMOND OPARA , TION COMFORT-NWAODUH and others
Defendant: RUNNELLS SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL OF UNION COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?