Cases 11 - 20 of 851
BROWN v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
SHAKOUR BROWN
Defendant:
ERIC ARMEL, LIEUTENANT A TYNER, SGT. THOMAS BURRIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Yoder et al
as 1:2024cv00723
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Defendant:
Lieutenant Yoder, C.O. Lazicki and Hearing Examiner Yodis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA. et al
as 5:2024cv01736
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. COHEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA., ERIC MUHLENBERG, CHRISTY BILLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivan McKinney v. Fitzgerald, et al
as 24-1552
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
SGT. FITZGERALD, OFFICER FORBES, GEORGE ROBINSON, Asst Administrator and others
Derrick Jacobs v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 24-1696
Plaintiff:
DERRICK U. JACOBS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and others
Shears v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Daaron Shears
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Burns, Correctional Officer D. Heverly and Lieutenant Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. STOCKTON et al
as 2:2024cv00564
Defendant:
RONALD STOCKTON, LAUREL HARRY, RANDY IRWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, RANDY IRWIN, DEPUTY M-BLICHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE HILL
Defendant:
WARDEN RANDY IRWIN, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, SERGEANT J.T. KRAFCZYNSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry, III v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Henry, III
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Laurel Harry, George M. Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
