Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Shannon Mayo v. Rogers, et al
as 20-3619
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER ROGERS, UNIT MANAGER TIMOTHY LITTLE and SERGEANT MCCLELLAND
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANNON MAYO
MAYO v. ROGERS et al
as 3:2020cv00185
Defendant:
SERGEANT MCCLELLAND, CORRECTIONS OFFICER ROGERS and UNIT MANAGER TIMOTHY LITTLE
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MAYO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BARNES v. MEDVA et al
as 3:2019cv00202
Defendant:
SCI SOMERSET SECURITY DEPT., LT. LINDSEY, CO GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DANTE BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MCCLELLAND v. MANAGED LABOR SOLUTIONS, LLC
as 5:2019cv05270
Defendant:
MANAGED LABOR SOLUTIONS, LLC
Plaintiff:
JAMES MCCLELLAND
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
MCCLELLAND v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv15325
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC
Plaintiff:
GAYLE MCCLELLAND
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VASQUEZ v. WINGARD et al
as 3:2019cv00040
Defendant:
DAVID ONSTEAD, MELISSA HAINSWORTH, DOUGLAS ABBOTT and others
Plaintiff:
RAMON VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Lindell Tate v. S. Wiggins, et al
as 19-1242
Defendant:
MELISSA HAINSWORTH, Superintendent, CARR, Corrections Officer, BRIAN HYDE, Health Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDELL TATE
MCCLELLAND et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv20026
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and MERCK & CO., INC
Plaintiff:
ROSE MCCLELLAND and JAMES MCCLELLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kent v. ARRIS International plc et al
as 1:2018cv01960
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
James A. Chiddix, Debora J. Wilson, Bruce McClelland and others
MCCLELLAND et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 3:2018cv17088
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC
Plaintiff:
ROSE MCCLELLAND and JAMES MCCLELLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
