Cases 11 - 20 of 43
FREEMAN:MCLEARY v. HOUSER et al
as 2:2021cv05297
Petitioner:
MR. MICHAEL FREEMAN:MCLEARY
Respondent:
MR. MORRIS L. HOUSER, MR. JOHN SHAPIRO, MR. LAWRENCE KRASNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kevin Powell v. Blanche Carney, et al
as 21-1259
Defendant / Appellee:
MISS. BLANCHE CARNEY, OFFICER DERECK HAWKINS, DR. THERESA YOGBOH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN L. POWELL
POWELL v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2020cv05400
Defendant:
DR. DONNA LEONE, NURSE/DR. GAYE, DEPUTY WARDEN BEAUFORE and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L. POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JACKSON v. FAULKNER et al
as 2:2020cv03547
Defendant:
MR. JOHN N. GRADEL, MS. JULIET FAULKNER, MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNIES OFFICES and others
Plaintiff:
DEREK WAYNE JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRAN et al v. WICK et al
as 1:2020cv01186
Plaintiff:
MS CINDY TRAN
Defendant:
REGENCY TRANSPORTATION, OLAN WICK and MR JOHN PAUL NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST INC. et al v. BARRY et al
as 1:2020cv00699
Defendant:
JOHN BARRY, JR., MRS. JOHN BARRY, JR., AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
BROWN v. LOOMIS et al
as 2:2019cv05996
Defendant:
MS. L. LOOMIS, MR. JOHN DOE, MR. E. BRADLEY and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENDES v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2019cv02087
Plaintiff:
MR. ADAM JOSHUA MENDES
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 2, CGO- MS. D. VARNER, LIETENANT A. LITWHILER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENDES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv04982
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, LIETENANT A. LITWHILER, MR. JOHN RAMSON and others
Plaintiff:
MR. ADAM JOSHUA MENDES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
