Cases 11 - 18 of 18
In re: Michael Wilson
as 13-2722
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL H. WILSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
WILSON v. PHERELL et al
as 2:2013cv00061
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. WILSON
Defendant:
MICHELLE PHERELL, OAKMAN, WATERFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Kroll Factual Data, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00305
Plaintiff:
Michael James Wilson
Defendant:
Kroll Factual Data, Inc. and Keypoint Government Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. THE HILLSIDE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2010cv03656
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. WILSON
Defendant:
THE HILLSIDE POLICE DEPARTMENT , TOWNSHIP OF HILLSIDE , THOMAS WINGATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. ALTOONA HOSPITAL et al
as 3:2010cv00713
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Wilson
Defendant:
Altoona Hospital, S.c.i. huntingdon prison and D.o.c. / department of corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. ALTOONA HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2010cv01296
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. WILSON
Defendant:
ALTOONA HOSPITAL, S.C.I. HUNTINGDON PRISON and D.O.C. / DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv74756
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE WILSON and DEBRA P. WILSON
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cross Claimant:
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY
Cross Defendant:
GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY, GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION, NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WILSON et al v. SALEM COUNTY et al
as 1:2007cv02282
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GEORGE WILSON and EMILY RUTH WILSON
Defendant:
SALEM COUNTY, SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN B. COOKSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
