Cases 11 - 20 of 26
MARTIN et al v. RESSLER et al
as 1:2019cv21263
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MARTIN and ANTONIA R. MARTIN
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BRYAN G RESSLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2016cv03449
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MARTIN
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY , NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , ANTONIO CAMPUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHAFFERMAN v. SCHWENGER et al
as 2:2015cv03731
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SCHAFFERMAN
Defendant:
BRIAN SCHWENGER and MICHAEL MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA/ Postal Inspector v. A Parcel Bearing the Express Mail Number EI948629948 US, Addressed to Michael Martin, 4357 E. 13th Circle, Tuscon, AZ 85711
as 1:2013mc00238
Plaintiff:
USA/ Postal Inspector
Defendant:
A Parcel Bearing the Express Mail Number EI948629948 US, Addressed to Michael Martin, 4357 E. 13th Circle, Tuscon, AZ 85711
MARTIN v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv06208
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MARTIN
Defendant:
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and SAIA MOTOR FREIGHT LINE, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MARTIN v. WARREN et al
as 3:2012cv04670
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
USA v. Michael Martin
as 10-3436
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL MARTIN
MARTIN v. ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv68409
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MARTIN
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, ATLAS TURNER INC , CAREY CANADA INC and others
Intervenor:
VENTFABRICS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
