Cases 11 - 20 of 45
COLLINS v. CITY OF PLEASANTIVILLE et al
as 1:2020cv05984
Defendant:
PATROL OFFICER VANSYCKLE, JOHN DOE INVESTIGATORS 1-5, JOHN DOE OFFICERS 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD D. COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jose Peroza-Benitez v. Darren Smith, et al
as 20-1390
Defendant:
NICHOLAS EPOLITO and OFFICER DANIEL WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
C.I. MICHAEL PERKINS, C.I. KEVIN HASER and C.I. DARREN C. SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE ANTONIO PEROZA-BENITEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv20306
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ROBINSON v. CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE et al
as 1:2019cv00921
Defendant:
OFFICER JUAN MORILLO, OFFICER DANIEL DAVIS, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2019cv00110
Defendant:
DETECTIVE JAMES SIBAN, DETECTIVE JAMES PRIADKA, POLICE OFFICER PETER MARINO and others
Plaintiff:
ANTWINE HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antwaun Bush v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
as 19-1009
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DANIEL J. PAGA, JR., OFFICER DAVID CANNON, PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTWAUN BUSH
LEONE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2019cv00055
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff:
OFFICER DANIEL J. LEONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CHANDLER v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2018cv15227
Defendant:
CITY OF PATERSON, XYZ Corporation/Municpality, Daniel Cirasa and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARBATO v. CPL. CLINT GARVER et al
as 2:2018cv01381
Defendant:
CPL. CLINT GARVER, OFFICER DANIEL TRESSLER, SHENANGO TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. BARBATO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CALLAHAM v. BERGEN COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv14827
Defendant:
ERICA CHMIELEWSKI, LORI M. TIRRI, WILLIAM WOODWORTH and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD R. CALLAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
