Cases 11 - 20 of 40
In re: Michael Pendleton
as 15-2631
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM, Superintendent at SCI Somerset
Nominal Respondent:
KIM R. GIBSON
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gibson et al
as 1:2015cv00363
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
David R. Gibson , Robert V.A Harra, Jr. , Kevyn N. Rakowski and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Banks v. McCafferty et al
as 1:2014cv01234
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Landya McCafferty, Joseph N. Laplante, Steven J. McAuliffe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv03875
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY THOMPSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KEITH A. PESTO, KIM R. GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2014cv00122
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY THOMPSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KEITH A. PESTO, KIM R. GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvianette Gibson-Kennedy v. Robert Slutsky
as 14-1508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALVIANETTE GIBSON-KENNEDY
Not Party - Appellant:
LILLIAN R. GIBSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT M. SLUTSKY, Esq., DIANE ZABONSKI, ESQ, KAPLANA DASHI and others
In Re: Kevin Flood
as 14-1322
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: KEVIN PATRICK FLOOD
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
KIM R. GIBSON and KEITH A. PESTO
In re: Jamaluddin Almahdi
as 13-4367
Petitioner:
In re: JAMALUDDIN ALMAHDI
Respondent:
ROBERT WERLINGER
Nominal Respondent:
KIM R. GIBSON
In re: Kevin Patrick Flood
as 13-4245
Petitioner:
In re: KEVIN PATRICK FLOOD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
KIM R. GIBSON and KEITH A. PESTO
In re: Kevin Flood
as 13-3521
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: KEVIN PATRICK FLOOD
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
KIM R. GIBSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
